Legal Opinion

Nachtweih v. Maravilla

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 1993No. 62188PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAHAN, Judge.

Plaintiff Linda Nachtweih (“Plaintiff’) appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of Defendant L.M. Ma-ravilla, M.D. (“Defendant”) in a negligence action seeking damages for failure to diagnose her pregnancy. The sole issues on appeal are whether the trial court erred in allowing a deposition to be read to the jury pursuant to Rule 57.07(a)(2) and, if so, whether the error was sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial. We hold that admission of the deposition was error but was not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.

Plaintiff initially…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McFadden v. McFaddenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. DeLong v. Hilltop Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Null v. GrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. McClelland v. OzenbergerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Maplewood Planing Mill & Stair Co. v. Pennant Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1961

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fairbanks v. WeitzmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Soper v. BoppMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Amador v. Lea's Auto Sales & Leasing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Wilson v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Felton v. HulserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API