Legal Opinion

Wiedemann v. Crawford

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 16, 1911PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appea] from Campbell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Reversing.

The appellee Crawford in September, 1909 filed his petition in equity against the appellant Wiedemann, in which he set out that in January, 1909, the suit of Charles Wiedemann against the Highland Hotel Company for a sale of the property -of that company was pending in the Campbell circuit court; that he and Wiedemann were then each -owners of preferred and common stock in said company, and each had a claim for money loaned to it, and that in January, 1909, they entered into the following written agreement:

“Both owning preferred stock in, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garth v. Davis & JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  2. Fishback v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  3. Estes v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Day v. AmburgeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Stewart v. StovallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. United Mining Co. v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Doom v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Blanton v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API