Legal Opinion
In Re Lindsay-Strathmore Irr. Dist.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided November 13, 1937No. 4575PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
LindsayrStrathmore Irrigation District, which we shall call “the, district/’ is an irrigation district, organized under the “California Irrigation District Act,” approved March 31, 1897 (St.Cal.í897, p. 254), and the acts amending and supplementing it. It comprises approximately 15,260 acres of land located in Tulare county, Cal., and is organized for the purpose of constructing, improving, maintaining, and operating improvement projects and works devoted chiefly to the improvement of lands within its ■ boundaries for agricultural purposes. Alleging that it is a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Lincoln County v. LuningSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank of RoanokeSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Perry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1948
- Imperial Irrigation District v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Hardyman v. CollinsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
- Imp. Irrig. Dist. v. St. Wat. Resources Ctrl.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Supreme Forest Woodmen Circle v. City of Belton, Tex.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.