Legal Opinion
Sigler v. State, 08-Ca-79 (4-27-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 27, 2009No. 08-CA-79PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Respondent-Appellant, the State of Ohio, through the Ohio Attorney General's Office, appeals the Richland County trial court's ruling finding Senate Bill 10, Ohio's sexual offender classification and registration scheme, to be unconstitutional in its entirety.
{¶ 2} On May 3, 2000, Petitioner-Appellee entered a guilty plea to one count of attempted rape. He was sentenced to six years in prison and was found to be a sexually oriented offender. In December, 2007, Appellee received notification of his reclassification as a Tier III offender under recently enacted Senate Bill 10,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Sexual-Offender Reclassification CasesOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Burbrink v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Davis v. MeyersOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Sigler v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2009