Burbrink v. State
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Sundermann, Judge.
{¶ 1} On April 29, 2005, petitioner-appellee Robert Burbrink pleaded guilty in a plea bargain to sexual battery in violation of R.C. 2907.03(A)(3). Prior to accepting the plea, the trial court stated, “There is an agreement that he be a sexually-oriented offender.” Defense counsel stated that he had explained to Burbrink that sexually oriented offender was the lowest classification. The court *132informed Burbrink about his registration requirements. The court then accepted the plea, found Burbrink guilty of sexual battery, imposed sentence, and found that Burbrink was a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. BethelOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Matz v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Kiser v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. DanielOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. CarlisleOhio Court of Appeals · 2019