Legal Opinion

Burbrink v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 2009No. C-081075PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sundermann, Judge.

{¶ 1} On April 29, 2005, petitioner-appellee Robert Burbrink pleaded guilty in a plea bargain to sexual battery in violation of R.C. 2907.03(A)(3). Prior to accepting the plea, the trial court stated, “There is an agreement that he be a sexually-oriented offender.” Defense counsel stated that he had explained to Burbrink that sexually oriented offender was the lowest classification. The court *132informed Burbrink about his registration requirements. The court then accepted the plea, found Burbrink guilty of sexual battery, imposed sentence, and found that Burbrink was a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. State v. BethelOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Matz v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Kiser v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DanielOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. State v. CarlisleOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API