Legal Opinion
In re Sexual-Offender Reclassification Cases
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 17, 2010PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
{¶ 1} The following dispositions of currently pending appeals and certified conflicts are hereby entered based on our decision in State v. Bodyke, 126 Ohio St.3d 266, 2010-Ohio-2424, 933 N.E.2d 753.
Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
I
{¶ 2} The judgments of the courts of appeals in the following cases are affirmed, because the courts of appeals held the Adam Walsh Act to be unconstitutional expressly on separation-of-powers grounds.
{¶ 3} 2009-1213. Spangler v. State, Lake App. No. 2008-L-062, 2009-Ohio-3178, 2009 WL 1856784.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BodykeOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Ellis, 90844 (12-4-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Sigler v. State, 08-Ca-79 (4-27-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Brooks v. State, 08ca009452 (4-20-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Moran v. State, Ca2008-05-057 (4-20-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. Ortega-MartinezOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Bundy v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. GallowayOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Gildersleeve v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. JillsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.