Legal Opinion

Haight v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 8, 1976No. CR75-180PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellants were convicted by a jury of possession of a controlled substance, marijuana, with intent to deliver. [Ark. Stat. Ann. § 82-2617 (a) (1) (ii) (Supp. 1975)]. Appellant Haight received a five year sentence and appellant Sutton received a three year sentence in the Arkansas Department of Correction. Appellants first contend for reversal that the trial court erred in denying their motion to dismiss on the ground of double jeopardy. Amendment 5, United States Constitution and Article 2, § 8, Constitution of Arkansas (1874). Appellants’ first trial resulted in a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. Warren v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Walters v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  4. Flaherty v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MeeksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Gustafson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Hoback v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Kellensworth v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API