Franklin v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
Appellants filed their petition for postconviction relief from the maximum sentence for burglary of the Bank of Chidester imposed by a jury on September 11, 1969. The only ground that merits any real consideration is their contention that they were deprived of the effective assistance of counsel in violation of their constitutional rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. They alleged that during the trial William I. Purifoy, their employed counsel, was intoxicated, that he had a wine bottle in his back pocket in full view…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. HesterOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Barnes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Leasure v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Abbott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Blackmon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.