Legal Opinion
City of Bismarck v. Bosch
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 2005No. 20040157PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Mitchell David Bosch appealed from a conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the test results of an Intoxilyzer test, and we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On November 26, 2003, Bosch was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol. He was taken to the Bismarck Police Department, where he consented to an Intoxilyzer test. The test indicated Bosch’s blood alcohol level was .15 percent.
[¶ 3] Bosch was charged with DUI. He pled not guilty and a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moser v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Ringsaker v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SchneiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Henderson v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. ZimmermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- May v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Kiecker v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. GietzenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. StrohNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Grand Forks v. ScialdoneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.