Legal Opinion
City of Grand Forks v. Scialdone
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 2005No. 20040119PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Candace Scialdone appealed a criminal judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding her guilty of actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or with an alcohol concentration of at least ten one-hundredths of one percent by weight. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] After her arrest for being in actual physical control of a vehicle, Scialdone consented to an Intoxilyzer test. Scial-done requested any material and information subject to disclosure under N.D.R.Crim.P. T6. On March 23, 2004, before jury selection that day, the City of Grand…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Harold v. Gleason, Paul Luftig and J. Michael CarterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Elizabeth Gonzalez-RinconCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Nicholas DeliaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Ringsaker v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Grand Forks v. RamstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SkarsgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Burns v. BurnsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. LougheadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Leno v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Doll v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.