Legal Opinion

Bauler v. Pressed Steel Car Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 23, 1948No. 46 C 185PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

The matters presently pending before the court are (1) the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file their third amendment to the amended complaint, and (2) certain claims of guard sergeants which were not disposed of in the court’s memorandum opinion of May 27, 1948,

1. The basis of plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint after the trial is primarily Federal Civil Rule 15(b), 28 U.S. C.A., which applies to amendments to conform to the evidence and allows such motion to be made “even after judgment.” The plaintiffs’ proposed amendment pleads that the activities…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bell v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. National Automatic Laundry and Cleaning Council v. George P. Shultz, Secretary, U. S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. Paul E. Hasselbrink and Eva G. Hasselbrink v. George SpeelmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  4. Martinez v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1968
  5. Addison v. Huron Stevedoring Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API