Legal Opinion
Martinez v. Phillips Petroleum Company
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided April 11, 1968No. Civ. 4-66-8PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
McNICHOLS, District Judge.
This is an action for damages brought by Jack Martinez and Joe Talbot on behalf of themselves and on behalf of the 106 consenting plaintiffs similarly situated, as plaintiffs, against their employer, Phillips Petroleum Company, as defendant. The action is for overtime compensation allegedly owing to plaintiffs as a result of their employment by defendant under a contract between defendant and the United States Atomic Energy Commission.
The complaint, which consists of two counts, alleges two causes of action. Briefly, Count One alleges overtime…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Foley Bros., Inc. v. FilardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- German Alliance Insurance v. Home Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Levinson v. Spector Motor ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- National Automatic Laundry and Cleaning Council v. George P. Shultz, Secretary, U. S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Project Hope v. M/V IBN SINACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Clifton D. Mayhew, Inc. v. WirtzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- Johnnie Mae Cole v. Farm Fresh Poultry, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Gilliam v. City of OmahaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.