National Automatic Laundry and Cleaning Council v. George P. Shultz, Secretary, U. S. Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:
Appellant brought an action for a judgment declaring invalid a ruling of the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor that coin-operated laundries (sometimes called launderettes) are subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act (Act), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., as amended in 1966. The District Court dismissed the action, stating, “[T]he Court is of the opinion that there exists no case or controversy between the parties.” We find there was jurisdiction but conclude judgment should be entered in favor of defendant on the merits.
I. FACTS
The events…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by247 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Russell E. Train, in His Official Capacity as Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Ciba-Geigy Corporation v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- The Wilderness Society v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
242 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.