Legal Opinion

Sexson v. Merten

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1981No. 10-81-01724, SC 27750PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding in which the petitioner, who is the defendant in a criminal prosecution for the crime of rape, seeks to compel the respondent, who is the trial judge before whom defendant secured his release pending trial, to remove certain conditions placed by the judge in the “security release agreement” under which defendant was released pending trial pursuant to ORS 135.265(1) and (2).

The attorneys for the defendant and the attorneys for the State of Oregon, who represent the respondent (the trial judge), agree on the relevant facts of the case. Defendant was indicted for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CRADDOCKOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State Ex Rel. Haas v. SchwabeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Willamette National Lumber Co. v. Circuit CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Knutson v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Lindell v. KaluginOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchenckOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. BurlesonOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Department of Revenue v. McCannOregon Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API