Legal Opinion

Johnson v. CRADDOCK

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1961PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

This is an action for a writ of mandamus. It is brought by petitioner Johnson to compel the Harney County Court to sell certain tax-foreclosed property to him. He claims as his right to such relief that the county contracted to sell the property to others, notwithstanding his larger bid for the same.

Defendants and intervenors successfully demurred to petitioner’s amended alternative writ. Upon Johnson’s refusal to plead further, the trial court sustained the demurrer and disallowed the writ, whereupon he appealed.

The demurrer challenged the sufficiency of the writ. It projects as the cardinal…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Allen v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Swift & Co. v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State ex rel. Stuewe v. HindsonMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Holman Transfer Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1952

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lerch v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  3. Parks v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF TILLAMOOK CTY.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. Sexson v. MertenOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. LaemoaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API