Legal Opinion

Six Star Lubricants Co. v. Morehouse

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 6, 1937No. 14,146PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous

This action was brought by the defendant in error, to whom we shall refer as plaintiff, to recover from plaintiff in error, which we shall call defendant, royalty accruing between April 9 and August 31, on greases and lubricants allegedly compounded under what is known as the Pettit patents and sold by defendant as licensee thereunder, claimed to be due pursuant to a written contract dated October 26, 1925, which modified a pre-existing contract between the parties dated August 7, 1922. The cause was tried before a jury in the court below and judgment rendered for the plaintiff in accordance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. HawleySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  3. Morath v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  4. Globe National Bank v. McLeanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  5. Platte Valley Ditch & Reservoir Co. v. H. C. Lallier Construction & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McLeod v. CrawfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Ar-Tik Systems, Inc. v. Dairy Queen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  3. National Cash Register Company v. LightnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  4. Thys Co. v. BrulotteWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Ar-Tik Systems, Inc. v. Dairy Queen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API