Legal Opinion

McLeod v. Crawford

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1964No. 35515PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

This is an action for breach of contract growing out of three territorial agreements in the State of Nebraska between the plaintiffs, McLeods, and the defendants, Crawfords, as to the use of the “Dairy Queen” soft ice cream trademark and the soft ice cream machine used in connection therewith, being described herein as Patent No. 2080971. The questions presented in this case arise out of the defendants’ claim that the territorial contracts entered into were illegal, being a “patent misuse” because they were agreements against public policy in extending the patent monopoly beyond the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Telechron, Inc. v. Telicon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lortscher v. WinchellNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Baye v. Airlite Plastics Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. United States v. WernentinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  4. Pearce v. Elic Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Muller Enterprises, Inc. v. GerberNebraska Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API