Legal Opinion

Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Union Pac. R.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 22, 1920No. Nos. 4, 5PublishedCited by 24 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Two actions by the Pressed Steel Car Company against the Union Pacific Railroad Company and against the Southern Pacific Company. Judgment for plaintiff for an insufficient amount (254 Ecd. 316), and it brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, Circuit Judge.

This is a writ of error taken by the plaintiff Car Company to a judgment in its favor for $9,150.06 in an action tried by the court without a jury. The case of the Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co., exactly similar in point of law, was argued at the same time.

November 1, 1905, the Pressed Steel Car Company and the Union Pacific Railroad Company entered into the following contract:

“Agreement made the 1st day of November, 1905, between Pressed Steel Gar Company, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of New…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Guerini Stone Co. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Rawlins v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. United States v. Harvey Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Straus v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  2. Dwight & Lloyd Sintering Co. v. GreenawaltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  3. Bucky v. SeboCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  4. Steiner Sales Co. v. Schwartz Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  5. Cold Metal Process Co. v. McLouth Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API