Legal Opinion

United States Casualty Co. v. Russell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 18, 1958No. 37332PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

It has been well established that “the period of employment generally includes a reasonable time for ingress to- and egress from the place of work, while on the employer’s premises.” Federal Ins. Co. v. Coram, 95 Ga. App. 622, 625 (98 S. E. 2d 214). See also Maryland Cas. Co. v. Sanders, 49 Ga. App. 600 (2) (176 S. E. 104); Employers Ins. Co. of Ala. v. Bass, 81 Ga. App. 306 (58 S. E. 2d 516); General Accident &c. Corp. v. Worley, 86 Ga. App. 794 (72 S. E. 2d 560); Travelers Ins. Co. v. Smith, 91 Ga. App. 305, 311 (85 S. E. 2d 484). These are all cases in which an award in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kowcun v. BybeeOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Eargle v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  3. Federal Insurance Co. v. CoramCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  4. Rogers's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. E. I. Dupont Denemours Co., Inc. v. ReddingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Helton v. Interstate Brands Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Dupper v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  4. West Point Pepperell, Inc. v. McEntireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Corbin v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API