Legal Opinion
Massey v. Arkansas & Missouri Highway District
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 3, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.
There are before us two separate actions involving the same subject-matter, namely, an attack on the validity of a statute authorizing the improvement of a public road in Pulaski County, and also an attack on the assessment of benefits and other proceedings of the board of commissioners. The two cases are consolidated here, and both will be disposed of in this opinion.
The Arkansas & Missouri Highway District in Pulaski County was created by act No. 82 of the General Assembly of 1919, and its validity was upheld by this court in the case of Van Dyke v. Mack, 139 Ark. 524. That statute…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Van Dyke v. MackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Johns v. Road Improvement DistrictsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Road Improvement Districts 1, 2 & 3 v. CrarySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- White v. Arkansas & Missouri Highway DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
3Cited by9 opinions
- Davis v. SchimmelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Drainage District No. 17Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. MayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Pulaski County v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Filbert v. Arkansas & Missouri Highway Dist.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.