Filbert v. Arkansas & Missouri Highway Dist.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
TRIEBER, District Judge.
There were eleven separate suits instituted by the plaintiffs, bufas the issues involved are the same *115in each of the actions, they were, hy consent of all the parties, consolidated and tried by the court sitting as a jury as one action; a jury having been waived by stipulation in writing.
The actions are on certificates of indebtedness issued by the defendant to the original payees, who are citizens of states other than the state of Arkansas, and by them assigned in due course to the plaintiffs, who are also citizens of states other than the state of Arkansas, of which…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Marsh v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Forbes Pioneer Boat Line v. Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Buchanan v. LitchfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Gunnison County Commissioners v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- (PC) Barbour v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Alexander v. KaoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
- Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. PhD Marketing, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2022