Pulaski County v. Commercial National Bank
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Appellants, County of Pulaski, City of Little Rock, and Little Rock Special School District, by their attorney, Mr. John M. Rose, complained to the assessor of Pulaski county that appellees, four banks domiciled in Little Rock and one bank in North Little Rock, in listing their property for assessment, used an improper formula by which to compute the value of the banks' shares of stock, resulting in too low an assessed valuation thereon. The assessor ignored the protest of appellants and assessed the shares of stock of appellees according to the calculations submitted by each of them,…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Coe v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Rees v. City of WatertownSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tug Valley Recovery Center, Inc. v. Mingo County CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Payne v. WaldenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972
- Davis v. SchimmelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- First National Bank v. Arkansas State Bank CommissionerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Bob Hankins Distributing Co. v. MaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.