Hewitt v. Craig
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 5 — MANDAMUS APPEALS FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT. Brief not in record. i. Gen. Eodman, under section 15, page 149 of General Statutes, had a lien upon the claim of Craig against the State from the time he first appeared before the legislative committees in advocacy of said claims.
Read the full summary
Case 5 — MANDAMUS APPEALS FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT. Brief not in record. i. Gen. Eodman, under section 15, page 149 of General Statutes, had a lien upon the claim of Craig against the State from the time he first appeared before the legislative committees in advocacy of said claims. (Robertson & Cleary v. Shutt, &c., 9 Bush, 659.) 2. All persons having an interest in the subject-matter of an action or proceeding, whether adverse to the plaintiff or defendant, or both, whether they be necessary parties or not, may intervene, and if such person is a necessary party to a complete…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE BENNETT
delivered the opinion oe the court.
The Legislature of this State, at its last session, passed an act for the benefit of the appellee. The preamble to the act sets ont, in substance, that certain settlements had been made and suits determined be*26tween the State and the appellee, growing out of the claims of the latter as agent of the State and keeper of the penitentiary; and that in said settlements, which were made through commissioners appointed by the State, certain mistakes were alleged by the appellee to have been made against him in giving the State improper credits, and in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Green v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1810
3Cited by6 opinions
- Podolsky v. RaskinIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Heyker v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Stewart v. County Court of Monongalia CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
- Lee v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Traylor v. CumminsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.