Weiss v. Tenney Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERLANDS, District Judge:
Plaintiff’s motion requires the filing of yet another opinion in the increasing *286stream of jurisprudence in an area of considerable importance to courts and litigants in this circuit, and especially in this district. The Court is called upon to determine whether, under revised Fed.R. Civ.P. 23, this action brought under the 1933 and 1934 Federal Securities Acts, as pleaded in an amended complaint filed May 24, 1963, may be maintained on a class basis.
Rapid development of Fed.R.Civ.P. 23 —taken in conjunction with the confusing and prolix papers arid briefs…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Korn v. Franchard Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Vitiello v. CicconiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- Buford v. American Finance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
- Vernon J. Rockler & Co. v. Graphic Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
- Gomez v. Illinois State Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.