Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Humphrey v. Kouri
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 24, 1987No. C8-87-1257PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
The question presented in this case is whether the trial court erred in refusing to grant an eminent domain hearing before court-appointed commissioners on the issue *413of the fair market value of advertising structures owned by Major Media, Inc.
FACTS
On May 9, 1986, the State of Minnesota petitioned the trial court for an order permitting the taking of certain lands by the state for highway purposes pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 117.042 (1985). On September 26, 1986, the court granted the state’s petition and ordered that title and possession in the condemned lands pass to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Creative Displays, Inc. v. South Carolina Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Korengold v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State v. PahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- City of Lakewood v. RogolskyCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1969
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Weber-Connelly, Naegele, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- In re Condemnation by the Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Matter of Minneapolis Com. Dev. AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987