Legal Opinion
In re Condemnation by the Minneapolis Community Development Agency
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 22, 1987No. C8-87-1498PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This is an appeal from a June 26, 1987, order of the trial court in a condemnation proceeding. The trial court ordered title and possession in three parcels, 17-1, 17-2 and 17-5, to vest in the Minneapolis Community Development Agency (MCDA); or*129dered Naegele Outdoor Advertising Inc. (Naegele) to remove its billboards from the parcels; and found Naegele has no compen-sabie real property interest in parcels 17-1, 17-2, 17-4 and 17-5. The trial court ordered the commissioners not to hear evidence that Naegele unshed to offer relative to its billboards. We affirm.
FACTS
Naegele…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. Prow's Motel, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Creative Displays, Inc. v. South Carolina Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- R.C. Maxwell Co. v. Galloway TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- National Advertising Co. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- State ex rel. Commissioner, Department of Transportation v. TeasleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Matter of Minneapolis Com. Dev. AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- STATE EX REL. COM'R v. TeasleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995