Legal Opinion

United States v. Hudson

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided June 30, 2003No. CGCMS 24217; Docket No. 1159PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUM, Chief Judge:

Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his *831pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, he was convicted of one specification of wrongful possession of Oxycondone Hydrochloride (OxyContin), a schedule II controlled substance, and one specification of wrongful use of OxyContin, in violation of Article 112a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 912a; one specification of unauthorized absence for two days, in violation of Article 86, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 886; one specification of failure to obey a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. BrittonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  4. United States v. LibecapU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  5. United States v. HaynesU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  2. United States v. MillerU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  3. United States v. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API