United States v. Hudson
U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BAUM, Chief Judge:
Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his *831pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, he was convicted of one specification of wrongful possession of Oxycondone Hydrochloride (OxyContin), a schedule II controlled substance, and one specification of wrongful use of OxyContin, in violation of Article 112a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 912a; one specification of unauthorized absence for two days, in violation of Article 86, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 886; one specification of failure to obey a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. BrittonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. LibecapU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
- United States v. HaynesU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. MillerU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004