Legal Opinion

Protective National Insurance v. Commonwealth Insurance

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided March 16, 1989No. CV 86-0-446PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD G. KOPF, United States Magistrate.

The Protective National Insurance Company of Omaha (Protective) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, moves the court for an order requiring the Commonwealth Insurance Company (Commonwealth) and its Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) spokesperson, Elizabeth Murphy (Murphy) to:

1. Answer questions concerning the factual basis of Commonwealth’s allegations in its answer and counterclaim;

2. Answer questions which Murphy refused to answer during the deposition; and

3. Produce all documents which form the basis of or relate to the facts upon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. In Re MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. Mitsui & Co. v. Puerto Rico Water Resources AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1981
  5. Inalouise Cates v. Ltv Aerospace Corporation, Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
  2. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2006
  3. Prokosch v. Catalina Lighting, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
  4. Starlight International Inc. v. HerlihyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  5. Andritz Sprout-Bauer, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API