Legal Opinion
United States v. Taylor
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided February 27, 1996No. 3:89CV00231PublishedCited by 173 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ELIASON, United States Magistrate Judge.
The matter before the Court concerns the extent of the duty which Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6) imposes on a corporation or other entity to conduct an investigation prior to its deposition. Plaintiff United States has served a Rule 30(b)(6) notice of deposition on defendant Union Carbide Corporation (UCC).1 In like fashion, the Court must also decide the obligations of investigation imposed on a party by Fed.R.Civ.P. 36, in this case by plaintiffs Rule 36 request that UCC authenticate certain documents. Finally, the Court resets the expert discovery…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re Convergent Technologies Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. ButcherDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
- In Re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation. Petition of the Plaintiffs' Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver of First Bankers Trust and Savings Association, F.A. v. Southern Union Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Marker v. Union Fidelity Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by173 opinions
- Brazos River Authority v. GE Ionics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Bank of New York v. Meridien BIAO Bank Tanzania Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Black Horse Lane Assoc., L.P. v. Dow Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Louisiana Pacific Corp. v. Money Market 1 Institutional Investment DealerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Poole v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.