Legal Opinion
Yakima County v. Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 14, 2012No. 29763-2-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
¶1 — Futurewise and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation (Yakama) appeal the Yakima County Superior Court’s reversal of two Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (GMHB) determinations that the Yakima County Critical Areas Ordinance, Ordinance 13-2007, violated certain riparian requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA), chapter 36.70A RCW. Generally, Futurewise and Yakama contend the superior court should have left intact the GMHB’s stream buffer width and ephemeral stream decisions requiring further Yakima County action, apparently considered adverse to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Daughtry v. Jet Aeration Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- King County v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTHWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Whatcom County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Ferry County v. Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Whatcom County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Futurewise v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Holly Andren v. Wayne DakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.