Legal Opinion

State v. Makuch/Riesterer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 11, 2002No. CR98-1962, CR98-1961 A110292 (Control), A110839PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

The state appeals pretrial orders suppressing evidence of a marijuana grow operation in the basement of a business operated by defendants Paul Arthur Makuch and Leigh Ann Riesterer. ORS 138.060(1)(c). The trial court concluded that ORS 9.695(1) and (4) required suppression. As explained below, we hold that neither that statute nor Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution compels suppression. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

The facts 1 are complex and involve three separate searches that occurred on the same day, July 7,1998: (1) the search of the residence of Jeffrey Husk in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MakuchOregon Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API