State v. Makuch
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
In these two criminal cases, we decide whether the police unlawfully obtained evidence of defendants’ marijuana growing operation such that the evidence should be suppressed. The trial court suppressed that evidence under an Oregon statute, because the police had searched a lawyer’s personal organizer for defendants’ last names and addresses. The Court of Appeals reversed that part of the trial court’s orders, concluding that the protections of the Oregon statute did not apply in defendants’ cases and that the evidence should not be suppressed on any other ground. State v. Makuch/Riesterer,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. KostaOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Union Pacific Railroad v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. Soto-NavarroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. CarleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. Rodriguez-BarreraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. KnappCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.