Legal Opinion

Metcalf v. Intermountain Gas Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1989No. 17369PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Plaintiff, Armida Metcalf, appeals the district court’s decision granting partial summary judgment for her former employer, defendant Intermountain Gas Company (Intermountain), on two of her five causes of action: i.e., breach of the employment contract, and breach of a covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The trial court denied Intermountain’s motion for summary judgment on the three other causes of action: sex discrimination, age discrimination and breach of public policy, each of which is still pending and awaiting trial. On appeal we consider only the dismissal of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Lunneborg v. My Fun Life, Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. PressmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  3. Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Jenkins v. Boise Cascade Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Edmondson v. Shearer Lumber ProductsIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API