Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Owyhee Ditch Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The right of a mutual corporation or society to amend or to repeal its by-laws, or to enact others not inconsistent with the purpose of the organization, is recognized: Wist v. Grand Lodge, 22 Or. 271 (29 P. 610, 29 Am. St. Rep. 603, 40 Am. & Eng. Corp. Cas. 416). A by-law may and does operate as a contract among the members of the corporation. If a by-law is consistent with the articles of incorporation and is not in contravention of law or public policy, and if legally adopted, is binding both upon the member and the corporation : 14 C. J. 885. Of course if the adoption of or change in a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wist v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W.Oregon Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dentel v. Fidelity Savings and Loan AssociationOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State Ex Rel. Brewster v. OstranderOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Nevada Classified School Employees Ass'n v. QuagliaNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Barendse v. KNAPPA WATER ASSOCIATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Jones v. WallaceOregon Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API