Legal Opinion

Dentel v. Fidelity Savings and Loan Association

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1975PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The issue is whether the directors of a state authorized savings and loan association can eliminate the voting rights of depositors and borrowers, granted by the association’s- bylaws, by amending the bylaws.

ORS 722.310(2) provides that members of savings and loan associations shall be stockholders “and such others as the bylaws may prescribe. Memberships may be issued to borrowers of and investors in the association with such rights and liabilities as may be allowed by the bylaws.”

The bylaws of the defendant association provided that savings account holders and borrowers would be members.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. White Lumber Sales, Inc. v. SulmonettiOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Davison v. Parke, Austin & Lipscomb, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Faunce v. Boost Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. PyleOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. McConnell v. Owyhee Ditch Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. WSB INVESTMENTS, LLC v. Pronghorn Development Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Black v. GlassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Heine v. Bank of OswegoDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  4. McKee v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  5. McCallum v. GrayOregon Supreme Court · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API