Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Canning

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 3, 1969No. 42046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McINERNEY, Justice.

Mrs. Roberts instituted this action to quiet title to a leasehold estate. Canning, lessor and defendant in the trial court, cross-petitioned seeking to quiet title as owner of the premises. The trial court held that the lease expired by its express terms since the option to renew was not exercised thirty days prior to the expiration of the primary term. Judgment was rendered for Canning, and Roberts appeals.

Under the terms of the written lease, the lessee was granted the option of extending the primary term of the lease by written notice to the lessor at least thirty days…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. York v. TriggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. McClellan v. AshleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  3. Welch v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. Viersen v. BoettcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Burns v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. French Energy, Inc. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. French Energy, Inc. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API