Legal Opinion

City of Cudahy v. Firer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFaiRChild, J.

This case was tried in the court below with the case of Cudahy v. Firer, decided herewith (ante, p. 599, 255 N. W. 901), and was.argued in this court at the. same time that case was argued. The principles of law there discussed control the decision here.

During his second term, Firer embezzled from the City of Cudahy General Fund $30,072.35. He returned $3,000 from his own funds. From the Vocational Educational Fund he embezzled $4,532.10, returning from his own funds $2,450. From the School District No. 1 General Fund he. embezzled $115.71. The abstraction of money so made resulted in a loss…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newcomb v. IngramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Armitage v. . PulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. State Ex Rel. Cherry v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. Burnett v. MillsapsMississippi Supreme Court · 1881
  5. City of Cudahy v. FirerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Cudahy v. FirerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API