Legal Opinion

Armitage v. . Pulver

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1868PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The grounds upon which the appellants seek to reverse the judgment in this action, are:

1. That it is "an action at law," and cannot be maintained, because,

First, the plaintiff has not yet paid the sum assumed by him, and there are still outstanding claims against the sheriff which Gary's sureties may hereafter be required to pay.

Second, the plaintiff and the defendants were bound by different bonds, and in distinct and several penalties.

Third, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Quackenbush v. DanksCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. Warner v. PriceNew York Supreme Court · 1829

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Asylum of St. Vincent De Paul v. McGuireNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. NaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  3. American Employers' Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation v. Maryland Casualty Company, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  4. Durbin v. KuneyOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Thompson v. DekumOregon Supreme Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API