Legal Opinion
City of Cudahy v. Firer
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
There are involved in this case three different funds over which Firer, in his capacity of treasurer, exercised control. These are the City of Cudahy General Fund, hereafter called the city general fund; the School District No. 1 Bond Redemption Fund, hereafter called the school fund; and the Vocational Educational Fund, hereafter called the vocational fund.
When Firer entered upon his duties as city treasurer in May, 1928, the Fidelity & Deposit Company became surety upon his bond for the faithful performance of his duties as treasurer. By virtue of his position he was ex officio treasurer of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Atlantic Cotton Mills v. Indian Orchard MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Holden v. . New York and Erie BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Newell v. HadleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- First National Bank v. Town of New MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
- Estate of KochWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Cudahy v. FirerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936