Legal Opinion

Ieropoli v. AC&S CORP.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 2004No. 117 EM 2002PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY.

In this appeal, we review the order of the court of common pleas granting summary judgment to Appellee Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (“Crown Cork”) pursuant to the newly enacted statute (“Statute”) that limits the successor asbestos-related liabilities of certain Pennsylvania corporations. 15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1.1 For all the reasons that follow, we hold that the Statute is unconstitutional as applied under Article I, Section 11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. Accordingly, the order of the trial court is reversed.

On December 19, 2000, Appellants, Frank and Margaret…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Berry by and Through Berry v. Beech AircraftUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Singer v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Stilp v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In re W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  5. Jubelirer v. RendellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API