City of Rocky River v. State Employment Relations Board
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentHolmes, J.
I strongly *606dissent from the unprecedented and unlawfully determined decision of the majority.
The motion upon which the majority purports to base its determination has no legal basis in the rules of court, either for this court, any appellate court below, or the federal courts and, moreover, is clearly prohibited by the limitations upon post-decision motions contained in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court. As such, the action today constitutes the unlawful reviving of a finalized determination of this court, which should be barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
The motion filed by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Shearer v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Keesecker v. G. M. McKelvey Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
- OAMCO v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Village of Brewster v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.