OAMCO v. Lindley
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
On November 26,1986, this court, on rehearing, decided the within cause. Appellee has now filed an additional motion for rehearing contending that the scope and effect of our ruling with regard to the prospective application of the decision is unclear and thereby presents the Tax Commissioner with difficulty in implementing our ruling uniformly and fairly.
Finding several of the points made by the commissioner to be well-taken, the court treats appellee’s motion for rehearing as a motion for clarification and grants the motion.
Upon due consideration of the motion for clarification, it is the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hoover v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Schucker v. MetcalfOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- OAMCO v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by19 opinions
- Minster Farmers Cooperative Exchange Co. v. DuesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Lake Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- DiCenzo v. A-Best Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- CNG Development Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Lake County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.