Legal Opinion
United States v. Brumel-Alvarez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 29, 1992No. Nos. 89-50412, 89-50415, 89-50423, 89-50426, 89-50431, 89-50479, 89-50480PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
The opinion filed on September 29, 1992, is amended as follows:
[Editor’s Note: Amendments have been incorporated within published opinion.]
*1455Judges Kozinski and Leavy have voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Judge Poole has voted to grant the petition for rehearing and to accept the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App.P.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Janice Wallace, United States of America v. Elmore PennCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Benjamin Wai Silva v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Gary Benn v. John Lambert, Superintendent of the Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Thomas Luke GuagliardoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph v. NASH, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. StinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.