Legal Opinion

Gary Benn v. John Lambert, Superintendent of the Washington State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 26, 2002No. 00-99014PublishedCited by 224 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.

The State of Washington, through the superintendent of the Washington State Penitentiary, appeals the district court’s decision to grant Gary Michael Benn’s ha-beas corpus petition, arguing that the district judge erred in holding that the Washington State Supreme Court decision was contrary to or involved an unreasonable application of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and its progeny. Because we hold that the state court’s decision that there was no Brady violation in Benn’s case constitutes an unreasonable application of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by224 opinions

  1. Anton E. Barker v. Gary FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Alcala v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Nabil Raja Dandan, Ketty Dandan, Souzi Dandan, A.K.A. Souzy Dandan, Sandra Dandan, and Raja Nabil Dandan v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Jackson v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

219 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API