Legal Opinion
Claude v. Claude
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 11, 2013No. AC 33787PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
In this defamation action, the plaintiff, Phenol Claude, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to open the judgment of nonsuit. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for further proceedings.
*309The plaintiff initiated this action against the defendant, Julia Claude, in May, 2010. In July, 2010, the defendant moved for a nonsuit against the plaintiff for his failure to respond to interrogatories and requests for production served on him in June, 2010. On August 31, 2010, the court, Holzberg, J., issued the following order…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Biro v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Priest v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. WeinsteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Langewisch v. New England Residential Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Eremita v. MorelloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Grover v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Miller v. KissConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Duclos v. HayesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025