Legal Opinion
MT & M Gaming, Inc. v. City of Portland
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 3, 2016No. CC 121114443; CA A154206; SC S063648PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.
The judgment of the trial court and the decision of the Court of Appeals are affirmed.
WALTERS, J.
This case concerns the standing requirements for actions brought under the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, ORS 28.010 to 28.160, an action that is available to “any person *** whose rights, status or other legal relations are affected by” the law or legal instrument about which the declaration is sought. ORS 28.020. Plaintiff, a Washington corporation that operates a casino in that state, brought an action against the City of Portland under that act, seeking declarations that certain practices…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Wyoming v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Philibert v. KluserOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Cascadia Wildlands v. Or. Dep't of State LandsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Assn. v. City of BendCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Foote v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- McNichols v. Dept. of Fish and WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.