Legal Opinion

Allen's Collection Agency v. Lee

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1925No. Docket No. 4390PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

A partnership agreement was executed in writing on October 7, 1918, by W. K. Lee, Louis Zimmer, and William Lingg, for the purpose of cultivating, seeding, harvesting, and marketing the products of" certain agricultural lands in Kern County. The contract provided that Lee should furnish the lands, which he held under a lease from the Lerdo Land Company, and all stock, teams, and implements necessary for conducting the farming operations; Zimmer agreed to furnish all necessary seed, food for labor, and the feed and forage for livestock; and Lingg agreed to furnish his services. It was further…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Hind v. Oriental Products Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hassell v. BungeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Raynor v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Sayre v. LeonardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cooper v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Gantner v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Oakland Medical Building Corp. v. AureguyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. De Armas v. DickermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Lynn v. HermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API