Legal Opinion
Lynn v. Herman
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 18, 1946No. Civ. 3179PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying plaintiff’s claim to the right of delivery of an automobile to her.
Plaintiff brought this action in the usual form of claim and delivery to recover possession of a Studebaker sedan, alleging that defendant wrongfully removed it from her possession on May 24, 1944. ■ Defendant admitted taking possession of the car on that date. Her counsel states that she gave bond to retain possession and that the car has remained in her possession ever since, which we assume to be true.
Among many incompetent and irrelevant matters set forth in the pleading and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blethen v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Trimble v. TrimbleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Britton v. HammellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- P. A. Smith Co. v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Mundt v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fields v. MichaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Odone v. MarzocchiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Cranston v. MendenhallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Yearout v. American Pipe & Steel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.