Legal Opinion
Mountain States Natural Gas Corporation v. Petroleum Corporation of Texas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1982No. 81-2358PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Petroleum Corporation of Texas (Petco) appeals from a decision issued by the district court authorizing Mountain States Natural Gas Corporation (Mountain States) to join in the drilling of a well in New Mexico without penalty and ordering Petco to compensate Mountain…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Norton v. LiddelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ton Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Colorado Flying Academy, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, Federal Insurance Company, and Associated Aviation Underwriters v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Dorsett v. Valence Operating Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- Pueblo De Cochiti v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1986
- Cimarron Operating Co. v. BabbitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.