Legal Opinion
Pueblo De Cochiti v. United States
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided August 13, 1986No. CIV. 85-1552 JCPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CONWAY, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes on for consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, filed on February 7, 1986. The Defendants moved to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ Complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. The Court, having considered the pleadings, the memoranda submitted by the parties and the relevant law, finds that the Defendants’ Motion is not well taken regarding the first count of Plaintiffs’ Complaint and will be denied. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the second count of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Lyng v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bell v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dawson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Adamczyk v. Lever Bros. Co., Div. of ConopcoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Schwartzman, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1994
- Virginia Beach Policemen's Benevolent Ass'n v. ReichDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 607, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 947, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 997 State of Washington v. East Columbia Basin Irrigation District United States of America, East Columbia Basin Irrigation District, Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.